Peer Review Policy

Pak Advances in Engineering Research is committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity through a rigorous and transparent peer review process. The goal is to ensure that all published manuscripts meet the journal's academic and scientific standards, contributing valuable knowledge to the field of engineering research.

Key Aspects of the Peer Review Policy:

Triple-Blind Peer Review:

  • Pak Advances in Engineering Research follows a Triple-blind peer review process, meaning that the identities of both the authors and reviewers are kept confidential throughout the review process. This ensures that the evaluation is unbiased and based solely on the quality and scientific contribution of the manuscript.

Reviewer Selection:

  • Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the subject matter of the manuscript.

  • The editorial team ensures that reviewers have the necessary background and experience to provide a thorough evaluation of the manuscript.

  • The selection process also takes into account the independence of the reviewers and their absence of conflicts of interest with the authors.

Types of Manuscripts Reviewed:

  • Original Research Articles: Thorough reviews of the research methodology, results, and conclusions.

  • Review Articles: Evaluated for their thoroughness, relevance, and ability to synthesize existing knowledge.

  • Short Communications: Brief reports assessed for their novelty, relevance, and clarity of presentation.

Review Criteria:

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on the following criteria:

  1. Scientific Quality: The validity of the research design, methodology, and the appropriateness of data analysis.

  2. Originality and Contribution: The novelty of the research and its contribution to advancing knowledge in engineering research.

  3. Clarity and Structure: The clarity of writing, the logical flow of ideas, and the proper organization of the manuscript.

  4. Relevance: How well the manuscript fits within the scope of Pak Advances in Engineering Research and its significance to the engineering field.

  5. Ethical Standards: Compliance with ethical research guidelines, proper citation practices, and the use of ethical research methods.

Review Process:

  1. Upon submission, manuscripts are initially reviewed by the editorial team to ensure they meet the submission guidelines and scope of Pak Advances in Engineering Research.

  2. If the manuscript passes this initial review, it is sent to two or more independent reviewers who provide detailed feedback and recommendations.

  3. Reviewers typically have 3-4 weeks to complete their review. If additional time is needed, they are encouraged to notify the editorial team.

Decision Making:

Based on the reviewers’ feedback, the editorial team makes one of the following decisions:

  • Accept: The manuscript is accepted for publication, either with minimal revisions or without revisions.

  • Minor Revisions: The manuscript requires minor adjustments before it can be accepted for publication.

  • Major Revisions: The manuscript requires significant revisions and is sent back to the authors for substantial changes before reconsideration.

  • Reject: The manuscript does not meet the journal’s standards or scope and is not suitable for publication in Pak Advances in Engineering Research.

  • Authors are provided with the reviewers’ comments and must submit a revised version of the manuscript if revisions are requested.

Timeliness:

  • Pak Advances in Engineering Research strives to complete the peer review process within 4-6 weeks of submission. Authors are expected to return revised manuscripts promptly to avoid delays.

  • Reviewers are expected to complete their reviews on time, and the editorial team works to ensure the process is as efficient as possible.

Ethical Guidelines for Reviewers:

  • Reviewers must maintain confidentiality and not use any information from the manuscript for personal gain.

  • Reviewers are expected to provide objective, unbiased assessments and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict of interest exists, the reviewer must recuse themselves from reviewing the manuscript.

  • Reviewers should provide constructive, professional feedback aimed at improving the manuscript.

Transparency and Integrity:

  • Pak Advances in Engineering Research upholds the highest standards of transparency and integrity in the peer review process.

  • Authors are encouraged to disclose any conflicts of interest when submitting their work.

  • The journal has mechanisms to handle allegations of misconduct, including plagiarism or unethical research practices. In such cases, the manuscript will be thoroughly investigated, and corrective actions such as rejection or retraction may be taken.

Post-Publication Peer Review:

  • Pak Advances in Engineering Research encourages the continuation of scholarly discussion and engagement with published research.

  • Readers and authors can submit post-publication comments or critiques, which will be reviewed and published if deemed appropriate.

Conclusion:

By adhering to this peer review policy, Pak Advances in Engineering Research ensures that all manuscripts undergo a fair, rigorous, and transparent review process. This contributes to the dissemination of high-quality research, advancing the field of engineering education and practice.